🔗 Share this article

The Journey of a Cult is often defined by clear stages.

1. The Grand Vision

An inspiring figure or coaches introduce an innovative concept that promises a cure for disconnected individuals.

Thus we find ourselves. Preparations are underway to challenge the establishment in Australia. The gunships are circling. Signs of trouble appear from the out-houses. An isolated player, exposed, nervous, the words HIGH RELEASE POINT written on his body as a symbol, has come staggering from the field and is being led away under a blanket for a temporary assignment elsewhere.

Do you recall the early days, when optimism reigned? The era of early Bazball, of pure instinct.

2. Love-Bombing

Movement founders promise a reboot, a brighter tomorrow, camaraderie, redemption together who all believe in the big idea.

What did it represent initially? Just men on a balcony feeling good. Ink. Forearms. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Oh sure, England’s players often say it’s not a real term, ironically as it’s denied, what was that spectacle?

Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s Harry Brook playing a shot so depraved it defies description. It’s the excitement of the captain in ultimate mode, an expression conveying: pensive Nordic god, strong features, natural look, truly contemporary you half-expect to look down and notice he’s fielding at mid-off bare-chested and cradling a wild salmon.

It’s Ben Duckett continuing to have permission to talk in press conferences, appearing as a joyful figure in a waistcoat, expressing thoughts like we’re breaking down traditions. Indeed, the vibe, initially, was uplifting.

3. The Growth Phase

Building period. Unity enforced by rote learning of key phrases. These principles can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Does anyone else feel? The backlash, the anger, the disappointment after the first Ashes Test defeat feels overblown, unwarranted. England batted badly on the field, as is typical there. They were savaged in the field in a short span when tactics failed, carved around by Travis Head imitating their style effectively, adaptive to conditions, a performer excelling with aura.

Now there is the criticism, the anger, the perception of the team as a failure. The feeling seems to be that England don’t just need to lose, they should be dismantled, to be cleansed, destroyed, destroyed via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the simple basics of the veteran, marking achievements with a bashful smile as if receiving a rewarding prize. What will this do to them?

4. External Conflict

Problems arise because of mistakes. But the cult cannot admit errors. It begins to thrive on hatred of the outside world.

The fact remains, half a week out the next match, we are at a critical juncture in the story of this thing. England could quite easily win in Brisbane through aggressive play. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. In case of defeat it appears we really might be entering the decline.

Prior to that, a couple of points to note about this. More than two years ago, during the initial excitement, of light and heat, I wrote an article labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which proved the point because everyone knows a method to show something definitely isn’t a cult is should followers react defensively rejecting criticism of its truths.

What has happened recently are equally notable. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. We have a uniformly angry internet, angry English pundits, shots of angry middle-aged supporters abroad disappointed by the short match, like a room full of timeshare owners seeking justice.

Meanwhile, we have the wider backdrop of the host’s complex ingrained annoyance at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, out there saying, the methods you value and have honed as part of your identity culturally from us, well, it’s all a bit of a gag ultimately.

And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The style was a trend because cricket is a cult. Or at least, the team has long been exclusive, a group, a garden party, a restricted environment with a long history of ceremonial past defining it. Historically, this was a place where power and access are hoarded. It’s the imperial sport of England, the original sports washers. And surprisingly, Britain is itself a cult, a structure of hidden ranks, a royal family remains.

The players have been enclosed in this environment since childhood. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their upbringing, creating another a bubble, an exclusive group, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a coach encouraging individuality as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Stay present. Run towards the danger. However much you change, you remain stuck.

Considering this, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the movement, to recognize its positives, which are significant. How to define it? Encouraging expression. Challenging orthodoxies. Batting aggressively|Attacking with